viernes, 9 de junio de 2017

14 REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS SOBRE TAXONOMIA

 // Taxonomía // Evolución // 

  1. Alcaide, M., Scordato, E. S. C., Price, T. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2014). Genomic divergence in a ring species complex. Nature, 511(7507), 83–85.
  2. Andreasen, R. O. (1998). A new perspective on the race debate. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(2), 199–225.
  3. Aradhya, M., Wang, Y., Walker, M. A., Prins, B. H., Koehmstedt, A. M., Velasco, D., … Preece, J. E. (2013). Genetic diversity, structure, and patterns of differentiation in the genus Vitis. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 299(2), 317–330.
  4. Arber, A. (1938). Herbals: their origin and evolution. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Atran, S. (1987). Origin of the species and genus concepts: An anthropological perspective. Journal of the History of Biology, 20(2), 195–279.
  6. Baber, Z. (2016). The Plants of Empire: Botanic Gardens, Colonial Power and Botanical Knowledge. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(4), 659–679.
  7. Balint, G. P., Buchanan, W. W., & Dequeker, J. (2006). A brief history of medical taxonomy and diagnosis. Clinical Rheumatology, 25(2), 132–135.
  8. Barkley, T. M., DePriest, P., Funk, V., Kiger, R. W., Kress, W. J., & Moore, G. (2004). Linnaean nomenclature in the 21st Century: a report from a workshop on integrating traditional nomenclature and phylogenetic classification. Taxon, 53(1), 153–158.
  9. Bartstra, G.-J. (1982). Homo erectus erectus: the search for his artifacts. Current Anthropology, 23(3), 318–320.
  10. Belk, C., & Maier, V. B. (2013). Biology Science for Life with physiology. (Pearson, Ed.) (4th ed.).
  11. Benirschke, K., & Ryder, O. A. (1985). Genetic aspects of equids with particular reference to their hybrids. Equine Veterinary Journal, 17(S3), 1–10.
  12. Bickford, D., Lohman, D. J., Sodhi, N. S., Ng, P. K. L., Meier, R., Winker, K., … Das, I. (2007). Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(3), 148–155.
  13. Blackwell, W. H. (2004). Is it kingdoms or domains? Confusion & solutions. The American Biology Teacher, 66(4), 268–276.
  14. Bowen, B. W., Bass, A. L., Rocha, L. A., Grant, W. S., & Robertson, D. R. (2001). Phylogeography of the trumpetfishes (Aulostomus): ring species complex on a global scale. Evolution, 55(5), 1029–1039.
  15. Bretsky, P. W. (1979). History of Paleontology: Post-DarwinianHistory of paleontology: Post-darwinian. In Paleontology (pp. 384–395). Springer.
  16. Brower, A. V. Z. (2010). Alleviating the taxonomic impediment of DNA barcoding and setting a bad precedent: names for ten species of “Astraptes fulgerator”(Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Eudaminae) with DNA-based diagnoses. Systematics and Biodiversity, 8(4), 485–491.
  17. Brown, J. K., Frohlich, D. R., & Rosell, R. C. (1995). The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or a species complex? Annual Review of Entomology, 40(1), 511–534.
  18. Browne, J. (1992). A science of empire: British biogeography before Darwin. Revue D’histoire Des Sciences, 453–475.
  19. Buckeridge, J. S. (2009). The ongoing evolution of humanness: perspectives from Darwin to de Chardin. South African Journal of Science, 105(11-12), 427–431.
  20. Burggraf, S., Mayer, T., Amann, R., Schadhauser, S., Woese, C. R., & Stetter, K. O. (1994). Identifying members of the domain Archaea with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60(9), 3112–3119.
  21. Cañizares-Esguerra, J. (2006). Nature, empire, and nation: explorations of the history of science in the Iberian world. Stanford University Press.
  22. Cavalier-Smith, T. (1993). Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla. Microbiological Reviews, 57(4), 953–994.
  23. Cavalier-Smith, T. (2004). Only six kingdoms of life. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-B, 271(1545), 1251–1262.
  24. CAVALIER‐SMITH, T. (1998). A revised six‐kingdom system of life. Biological Reviews, 73(3), 203–266.
  25. Chang, H. (2007). Natural History or Natural System? Encoding the Textual Sign. Biosemiotics: Information, Codes and Signs in Living Systems, 169–178.
  26. Charmantier, I. (2011). Carl Linnaeus and the visual representation of nature. HIST STUD NAT SCI, 41(4), 365–404.
  27. Chatterjee, H. J. (2009). Evolutionary relationships among the gibbons: a biogeographic perspective. In The Gibbons (pp. 13–36). Springer.
  28. Chen, M., Zeng, J., de Hoog, G. S., Stielow, B., van den Ende, A. H. G. G., Liao, W., & Lackner, M. (2016). The concept of “species complex”illustrated by the Scedosporium apiospermum complex. Fungal Biology, 120(2), 137–146.
  29. Clifford, H. T., & Bostock, P. D. (2007). Introduction. Springer.
  30. Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Aristotle, the scale of nature, and modern attitudes to animals. Social Research, 421–440.
  31. Corbey, R. (2005). The metaphysics of apes: Negotiating the animal-human boundary. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Corliss, J. O. (1986). The Kingdoms of Organisms: From a Microscopist’s Point of View. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 1–10.
  33. Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., & Jenkins, F. A. (2006). A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature, 440(7085), 757–763.
  34. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origins of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.
  35. De Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56(6), 879–886.
  36. DeYoung, D. B. (1998). Creation and quantum mechanics. Institute for Creation Research.
  37. Douglas, M. (2005). Ambiguous Apes. The Metaphysics of Apes: Negotiating the Animal-Human Boundary, 5.
  38. Dubois, A. (2007). Phylogeny, taxonomy and nomenclature: the problem of taxonomic categories and of nomenclatural ranks. Zootaxa, 1519, 27–68.
  39. Dubois, A. (2008). A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93(4), 857–863.
  40. Dubois, A. (2011). Species and “strange species” in zoology: Do we need a “unified concept of species”? Comptes Rendus Palevol, 10(2), 77–94.
  41. Einarson, B. (1976). The manuscripts of Theophrastus’ Historia plantarum. Classical Philology, 71(1), 67–76.
  42. Eliade, M., ET, & Ledesma, M. P. (1974). Herreros y alquimistas. Alianza Madrid.
  43. Erskine, A. (1995). Culture and power in ptolemaic Egypt: The Museum and Library of Alexandria. Greece and Rome (second Series), 42(01), 38–48.
  44. Fantini, B. (2013). Forms of thought between music and science. The Emotional Power of Music. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musical Arousal, Expression and Social Control, 257–270.
  45. Fara, P. (1997). The Appliance of Science: The Georgian British Museum. History Today, 47(8), 39.
  46. Fisher, R. A. (1950). Contributions to mathematical statistics.
  47. Forbes, S. (2008). How botanic gardens changed the world. In Proceedings of the History and Future of Social Innovation Conference. Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies, University of South Australia (pp. 1–6).
  48. Forbes, S. J. (2016). Collections and knowledge: constancy and flux in a sixteenth-century botanic garden. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 36(4), 245–260.
  49. Ford, B. J. (1981). The van Leeuwenhoek specimens. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 36(1), 37–59.
  50. Forey, P. L. (2005). Naming the World: Is There Anything Left of Linnaeus? PROCEEDINGS-CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 56, 182.
  51. Fracchia, J. (2014). Organisms and Objectifications: A Historical-Materialist Inquiry into the “Human and Animal.” Konturen, 6, 41–61.
  52. Fu, D. (1993). Problem Domain, Taxonomy, and Comparativity in Histories of Science—With a Case Study in the Comparative History of “Optics.” In Philosophy and conceptual history of science in Taiwan (pp. 123–147). Springer.
  53. Futuyma, D. (2005). Evolution (1st ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer.
  54. Genesis, I. I. (2005). Crafting the Primate Order. The Metaphysics of Apes: Negotiating the Animal-Human Boundary, 2, 36.
  55. Gest, H. (2004). The discovery of microorganisms by Robert Hooke and Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, fellows of the Royal Society. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 58(2), 187–201.
  56. Gould, S. J. (1982). Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. Science, 216(4544), 380–387.
  57. Graham, D. E., Overbeek, R., Olsen, G. J., & Woese, C. R. (2000). An archaeal genomic signature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7), 3304–3308.
  58. Grene, M. (1974). Is genus to species as matter to form? Aristotle and taxonomy. In The Understanding of Nature (pp. 108–126). Springer.
  59. Guasparri, A. (2013). Explicit nomenclature and classification in Pliny’s Natural History XXXII. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(3), 347–353.
  60. Guiry, M. D. (2012). How many species of algae are there? Journal of Phycology, 48(5), 1057–1063.
  61. Haycox, S. W., Barnett, J. K., & Liburd, C. (1997). Enlightenment and Exploration in the North Pacific, 1741-1805. University of Washington Press.
  62. Hebert, P. D. N., Penton, E. H., Burns, J. M., Janzen, D. H., & Hallwachs, W. (2004). Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(41), 14812–14817.
  63. Heller, J. L. (1964). The early history of binomial nomenclature. Hunt Botanical Library, Carnegie Institute of Technology.
  64. Hoefnagels, M. (2015). Biology: concepts and investigations (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill New York.
  65. Horwich, P. (1993). World changes. Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science.
  66. Johnson, K. (2007). Natural history as stamp collecting: a brief history. Archives of Natural History, 34(2), 244–258.
  67. Keaney, J. J. (1968). The Early Tradition of Theophrastus’ Historia Plantarum. Hermes, 96(H. 3), 293–299.
  68. Keller, M. (2003). Grapevine anatomy and physiology. Course Text for WSU Professional Certificate in Viticulture, Washington.
  69. Keynes, R. D. (2002). Fossils, Finches, and Fuegians: Darwin’s Adventures and Discoveries on the Beagle. OUP USA.
  70. Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 385–418.
  71. Kluge, N. Y. (1999). A System of Alternative Nomenclatures of Supra-species Taxa Linnaean and Post-Linnaean Principles of Systematics. Entomological Review, 79(2), 133–147.
  72. Knafl, K. A., & Morse, J. M. (1994). Promoting academic integrity in qualitative research. Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, 357–374.
  73. Koerner, L. (1996). Carl Linnaeus in his time and place. Cultures of Natural History, 145–162.
  74. Kuchta, S. R., & Wake, D. B. (2016). Wherefore and Whither the Ring Species? Copeia, 104(1), 189–201.
  75. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr.
  76. Kutschera, U., & Niklas, K. J. (2004). The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis. Naturwissenschaften, 91(6), 255–276.
  77. Laitman, J. T. (2004). How humans and their closest kin perceive the world: The special senses of primates. The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology, 281(1), 1077.
  78. Leukering, T., & Pieplow, N. (2009). Lilian’s Meadowlark: A Cryptic Species (?) and a Rare Colorado Breeder. Colorado Birds, 222.
  79. Linnaeus, C. (1771). Mantissa plantarum altera generum editionis VI et specierum editionis II. Laurentis Salvius, Stockholm, 588 pp.
  80. Llana, J. (2000). Natural history and the Encyclopédie. Journal of the History of Biology, 33(1), 1–25.
  81. Long, J. C., & Kittles, R. A. (2009). Human genetic diversity and the nonexistence of biological races. Human Biology, 81(5/6), 777–798.
  82. Mackean, D. G., & Hayward, D. (2014). Biology (3rd ed.). IGCSE Cambridge.
  83. MacLeod, R. (2004). The Library of Alexandria: centre of learning in the ancient world. IB Tauris.
  84. Mader, S. S. (2010). Biology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  85. Mader, S. S., & Windelspecht, M. (2015). Biology (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  86. Mader, S. S., & Windelspecht, M. (2018). Essentials of biology (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  87. Manktelow, M. (2010). History of taxonomy. Lecture from Dept. of Systematic Biology, Uppsala University.
  88. Marks, J. M. (2001). Human biodiversity: Genes, race, and history. Transaction Publishers.
  89. Mason, K. A., Losos, J. B., Singer, S. R., & Raven, P. H. (2014). Biology (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill New York.
  90. Mayr, E. (1969). The biological meaning of species*. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1(3), 311–320.
  91. Mayr, E. (1984). Typological versus population thinking. Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 14–38.
  92. Mayr, E. (1996). What is a species, and what is not? Philosophy of Science, 63(2), 262–277.
  93. Mayr, E. (1998). Two empires or three? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(17), 9720–9723.
  94. Mayr, E. (2000). The biological species concept. Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, 17–29.
  95. McCann-Mortimer, P., Augoustinos, M., & LeCouteur, A. (2004). “Race”and the Human Genome Project: constructions of scientific legitimacy. Discourse & Society, 15(4), 409–432.
  96. McCarthy, S., & Sanders, M. (2007). Broad classification and the provisional nature of science. Journal of Biological Education, 41(3), 123–130.
  97. McFee, A. F., Banner, M. W., & Rary, J. M. (1966). Variation in chromosome number among European wild pigs. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 5(1-2), 75–81.
  98. Meléndez, N. V., & JUÁREZ, A. L. C. (2012). Estrategias de enseñanza para aproximar a los niños a la adquisición del lenguaje escrito en 3er. año de preescolar. UPN-Ajusco.
  99. Merullo, A., & Fleming, F. (2009). The explorer’s eye: first-hand accounts of adventure and exploration. Hachette UK.
  100. Mindell, D. P. (1992). Phylogenetic consequences of symbioses: Eukarya and Eubacteria are not monophyletic taxa. Biosystems, 27(1), 53–62.
  101. Minelli, A. (1996). Linnaean Categories. Science, 274(5295), 1993–1997.
  102. Minelli, A. (2015). Taxonomy faces speciation: the origin of species or the fading out of the species. Biodivers J, 6, 123–138.
  103. Mulhern, A. (2015). The Sower and the Seed: Reflections on the Development of Consciousness. Karnac Books.
  104. Müller-Wille, S., & Charmantier, I. (2012). Natural history and information overload: The case of Linnaeus. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 4–15.
  105. Müller-Wille, S., & Scharf, S. (2009). Indexing nature: Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778) and his fact-gathering strategies.
  106. Nielsen, R. (2015). Genomics and the Biological Concept of Race. In 2015 AAAS Annual Meeting (12-16 February 2015). aaas.
  107. O’Brien, J. M. (2003). Alexander the Great: the invisible enemy: a biography. Routledge.
  108. Ogilvie, B. W. (2003). The many books of nature: Renaissance naturalists and information overload. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(1), 29–40.
  109. Parolini, G. (2015). In pursuit of a science of agriculture: the role of statistics in field experiments. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 37(3), 261–281.
  110. Paterson, H. E. H., & McEvey, S. F. (1993). Evolution and the recognition concept of species: collected writings. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore.
  111. Peirce, S. K. (1999). Three domains, not five kingdoms: a phylogenetic classification system. The American Biology Teacher, 132–136.
  112. Pellegrin, P. (1986). Aristotle’s classification of animals: biology and the conceptual unity of the Aristotelian corpus. Univ of California Press.
  113. Pessoa, E. M., Alves, M., Alves-Araújo, A., Palma-Silva, C., & Pinheiro, F. (2012). Integrating different tools to disentangle species complexes: a case study in Epidendrum (Orchidaceae). Taxon, 61(4), 721–734.
  114. Pimentel, M. C. S. A. G. T. (n.d.). En la actualidad, es incuestionable e irremplazable el papel de las Instituciones de Educación Superior en el desarrollo de las sociedades, pues es a través de la investigación y el conocimiento generado en ellas, que se renuevan las áreas científicas, te.
  115. Porshnev, B. F., Bayanov, D., & Bourtsev, I. (1974). The Troglodytidae and the Hominidae in the taxonomy and evolution of higher primates. Current Anthropology, 15(4), 449–456.
  116. Porter, J. R. (1976). Antony van Leeuwenhoek: tercentenary of his discovery of bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews, 40(2), 260.
  117. Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Wasserman, S. A., Cain, M. L., Minorsky, P. V, & Jackson, R. B. (2014). Campbell Biology (10th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.
  118. Reid, G. M. (2009). Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778): his life, philosophy and science and its relationship to modern biology and medicine. Taxon, 58(1), 18–31.
  119. Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution (3rd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.
  120. Rightmire, G. P. (1991). The dispersal of Homo erectus from Africa and the emergence of more modern humans. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(2), 177–191.
  121. Ritvo, H. (1995). Border trouble: Shifting the line between people and other animals. Social Research, 481–500.
  122. Robertson, L., Backer, J., Biemans, C., van Doorn, J., Krab, K., & Reijnders, W. (2016). Antoni van Leeuwenhoek: Master of the Minuscule. Brill.
  123. Rouhan, G., & Gaudeul, M. (2014). Plant taxonomy: a historical perspective, current challenges, and perspectives. Molecular Plant Taxonomy: Methods and Protocols, 1–37.
  124. Sadava, D., Berenbaum, M., & Hillis, D. (2014). Life the Science of Biology (10th ed.). Sinauer & MacMillian.
  125. Santos, C. F. M. dos, & Campos, R. D. da S. (2014). Notes on the Chain of Being and the place of blacks in eighteenth-century European natural philosophy. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 21(4), 1215–1234.
  126. Sapp, J. (2005). The prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy: meanings and mythology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 69(2), 292–305.
  127. Schiebinger, L., & Swan, C. (2007). Colonial botany: science, commerce, and politics in the early modern world. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  128. Schluter, D., & Pennell, M. W. (2017). Speciation gradients and the distribution of biodiversity. Nature, 546(7656), 48–55.
  129. Schuh, R. T. (2003). The Linnaean system and its 250-year persistence. The Botanical Review, 69(1), 59–78.
  130. Schwartz, J. H. (2016). What constitutes Homo sapiens? Morphology versus received wisdom. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 94, 1–16.
  131. Scott, E. (2016). The secret nature of seeds: science & seed improvement c. 1520-1700. University of East Anglia.
  132. Selosse, P. (2005). The underlying pattern of the Renaissance botanical genrepinax. Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past, 161–178.
  133. Shermer, M. (2002). In Darwin’s shadow: The life and science of Alfred Russel Wallace: A biographical study on the psychology of history. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  134. Short, R. V, Chandley, A. C., Jones, R. C., & Allen, W. R. (1974). Meiosis in interspecific equine hybrids. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 13(5), 465–478.
  135. Simon, E., Reece, J., & Dickey, J. (2013). Essential biology with physiology (4th ed.). Pearson.
  136. Sloan, P. R. (1972). John Locke, John Ray, and the problem of the natural system. Journal of the History of Biology, 5(1), 1–53.
  137. Solomon, E., Martin, C., Martin, D. W., & Berg, L. R. (2014). Biology (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  138. Sprague, T. A. (1950). The evolution of botanical taxonomy from Theophrastus to Linnaeus. Lectures on the Development of Taxonomy. Linn. Soc. Lond.
  139. Stanier, R. Y., & Van Niel, C. B. (1962). The concept of a bacterium. Archiv Für Mikrobiologie, 42(1), 17–35.
  140. Starr, C., Evers, C., & Starr, L. (2013). Biology: Today and Tomorrow With Physiology (4th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
  141. Stearn, W. T. (1959). The background of Linnaeus’s contributions to the nomenclature and methods of systematic biology. Systematic Zoology, 8(1), 4–22.
  142. Stigler, S. (2008). Fisher and the 5% level. Chance, 21(4), 12.
  143. Swain, T. (2012). Chemical plant taxonomy. Elsevier.
  144. Tavares, E. S., & Baker, A. J. (2008). Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of birds. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8(1), 81.
  145. Templeton, A. R. (2013). Biological races in humans. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(3), 262–271.
  146. Tiselius, A. (1958). Electrophoresis, past, present and future. Clinica Chimica Acta, 3(1), 1–9.
  147. Tobias, P. V. (1992). New researches at Sterkfontein and Taung with a note on Piltdown and its relevance to the history of palaeo-anthropology. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 48(1), 1–14.
  148. Varsava, N. B. (2011). Talking apes: the problem of anthropomorphous animals. University of British Columbia.
  149. Walsh, J. E. (1996). Unraveling Piltdown: The science fraud of the century and its solution.
  150. Wan, Y., Schwaninger, H. R., Baldo, A. M., Labate, J. A., Zhong, G.-Y., & Simon, C. J. (2013). A phylogenetic analysis of the grape genus (Vitis L.) reveals broad reticulation and concurrent diversification during neogene and quaternary climate change. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13(1), 141.
  151. Watson, E. E., Penny, D., & Easteal, S. (2001). Homo genus: a review of the classification of humans and the great apes. Humanity from African Naissance to Coming Millennia, 1000–1012.
  152. Weaver, S. A. (2015). Exploration: a very short introduction (Vol. 412). Oxford University Press, USA.
  153. Wellnhofer, P. (2010). A short history of research on Archaeopteryx and its relationship with dinosaurs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 343(1), 237–250.
  154. Whicher, O. (2015). The Heart of the Matter: Discovering the Laws of Living Organisms. Temple Lodge Publishing.
  155. Whittaker, R. H. (1969). New concepts of kingdoms of organisms. Science, 163(3863), 150–160.
  156. Wiley, E. O., & Lieberman, B. S. (2011). Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
  157. Wilkins, J., & Ebach, M. (2013). The nature of classification: relationships and kinds in the natural sciences. Springer.
  158. Wilson, E. O. (2005). The Linnaean enterprise: Past, present, and future. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 149(3), 344–348.
  159. Wilson, E. O. (2010). The major historical trends of biodiversity studies. In Systema Naturae 250-The Linnaean Ark (pp. 1–4). CRC Press.
  160. Woese, C. R. (2013). Carl Woese. NATURE, 493.
  161. Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990). Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(12), 4576–4579.
  162. Wolpoff, M. H., & Caspari, R. (1997). Race and human evolution. Simon and Schuster.
  163. Zachos, F. E. (2016). A Brief History of Species Concepts and the Species Problem. In Species Concepts in Biology (pp. 17–44). Springer.
  164. Zack, N. (2002). Philosophy of science and race. Psychology Press.
Taxonomía // Principal // Siguiente


No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario