domingo, 16 de octubre de 2016

8 REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRAFICAS DE GENÉTICA MENDELIANA

  1. Arriaga, H. O. (1987). La evolución del mejoramiento del maíz. In III Jornada Científica organizada por la Academia Nacional de Agronomía y Veterinaria y la Universidad Nacional del Litoral (30 de noviembre al 1 de diciembre de 1987, Santa Fe, Argentina).
  2. Benfey, O. T. (2007). The conceptual structure of the sciences. In Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (pp. 95–117). Springer.
  3. Benton, E. (1974). Vitalism in nineteenth-century scientific thought: A typology and reassessment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 5(1), 17–48.
  4. Cahoone, L. (2013). Physicalism, the Natural Sciences, and Naturalism. Philo, 16(2), 130–144.
  5. Castillo Murillo, L. M. (2011). Sistema didáctico para el aprendizaje de la genética.
  6. Chung, K. L. (1967). Markov chains. Springer.
  7. Cleophas, T. J., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2017). Medical Statistics: A Discipline at the Interface of Biology and Mathematics. In Understanding Clinical Data Analysis (pp. 193–221). Springer.
  8. Doebley, J. F., Gaut, B. S., & Smith, B. D. (2006). The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell, 127(7), 1309–1321.
  9. Edwards, S. B. (1991). Crops with wild relatives found in Ethiopia. Plant Genetic Resources of Ethiopia, 42–47.
  10. Falk, R. (2001). Mendel’s hypothesis. In Science, History and Social Activism (pp. 77–86). Springer.
  11. Falk, R. (2006). Mendel’s impact. Science in Context, 19(02), 215–236.
  12. Franklin, A. (2008). The mendel-fisher controversy. Ending the Mendel-Fisher Controversy, 1–77.
  13. Franklin, A., Edwards, A. W. F., Fairbanks, D. J., & Hartl, D. L. (2008). Ending the mendel-fisher controversy. University of Pittsburgh Pre.
  14. Henig, R. M. (2001). The monk in the garden: the lost and found genius of Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  15. Hernandez, P. N. (2000). Back in the Cave of the Cyclops. American Journal of Philology, 121(3), 345–366.
  16. Kutschera, U., & Niklas, K. J. (2004). The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis. Naturwissenschaften, 91(6), 255–276.
  17. Marinella, L. (2007). The nobility and excellence of women and the defects and vices of men. University of Chicago Press.
  18. Mayr, E. (1986). Joseph Gottlieb Kolreuter’s contributions to biology. Osiris, 135–176.
  19. McKusick, V. A. (1960). Walter S. Sutton and the physical basis of Mendelism. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 34, 487.
  20. Meineck, P., & Foley, H. P. (1998). Aeschylus: Oresteia. In Indianapolis and Cambridge (p. xxxiv). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
  21. Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen Des Naturforschenden Vereines in Brunn 4: 3, 44.
  22. Mendel, G. (1996). Experiments in plant hybridization (1865). Verhandlungen Des Naturforschenden Vereins Brünn.) Available Online: Www. Mendelweb. org/Mendel. Html (accessed on 1 January 2013).
  23. Moore, R. (2001). The “rediscovery” of Mendel’s work. Bioscene, 27(2), 13–24.
  24. Müller-Wille, S. (2007). Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: from nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38(4), 796–806.
  25. Pilgrim, I. (1986). A solution to the too-good-to-be-true paradox and Gregor Mendel. Journal of Heredity, 77(3), 218–220.
  26. Pires, A. M., & Branco, J. A. (2010). A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel—Fisher Controversy. Statistical Science, 545–565.
  27. Preus, A. (1977). Galen’s criticism of Aristotle's conception theory. Journal of the History of Biology, 10(1), 65–85.
  28. Punnett, R. C. (1905). Mendelism. London: Cosimo, Inc. Macmillan “original”.
  29. Rivas Mosquera, J. (n.d.). Desarrollo de una unidad didáctica del tema cruces monohíbridos de las leyes de Mendel soportada por TIC para grado octavo: estudio de caso en la Institución Educativa Fe y Alegría Popular No1, de la ciudad de Medellín. Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Medellín.
  30. Sadava, D., Berenbaum, M., & Hillis, D. (2014). Life the Science of Biology (10th ed.). Sinauer & MacMillian.
  31. Stubbe, H. (1972). History of genetics: from prehistoric times to the rediscovery of Mendel’s laws.
  32. Teicher, A. (2014). Mendel’s use of mathematical modelling: ratios, predictions and the appeal to tradition. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 36(2), 187–208.
  33. Tubbs, R. S., Ditty, B., Bosmia, A. N., & Bosmia, A. N. (2015). Ischiopagus and Diprosopus in India: Two Pairs of Conjoined Twins Perceived as Incarnations of Hindu Deities. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(1), 87–92.
  34. Whaley, L. A. (2003). Women’s history as scientists: a guide to the debates. ABC-CLIO.
  35. Williams, N. (2003). Speaking volumes. Current Biology, 13(20), R789–R790.
  36. Williams, N. (2005). Darwin on the web. Current Biology, 15(14), R530.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario